Recently, the Obama administration took an odd position in favor of the USA rights. Via an interoffice memo by David W. Ogden, Deputy US Attorney, the White House seems to have altered the medical marijuana attitude of the federal government. Ogden states that the US attorney's office won't continue prosecutions against growers, sellers, and patients as they abide the state regulations and laws, getting medical marijuana cards and medical marijuana licenses from certified medical marijuana doctors at legal marijuana clinics. Even though the reasons for president taking this position aren't clear, this might be a great victory for the right attorneys of the USA.
Since the acceptance of medical marijuana law in California, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, the state has been in a vehement strife with the federal government. This is a typical instance of the rights of the state. A lot of sellers and growers that are a "lawful" link of the provision chain, same as the patients, were walking on the razor's blade. Federal prosecution expands over them, inducing the same worry as a person that's about to hurl down 150 ft. to their end – with just a state, which is like a safety network. At the moment, fourteen states support medical marijuana legalization. They include Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. These fourteen states, the FBI, and the DEA will be getting memorandums that would instruct them to loosen their strivings in prosecuting medical marijuana patients, sellers, and growers and augment their efforts to prosecute offences, including unlawful weapon sales, violence, selling to underage , money greenwashing, and a lot of other crimes related to drugs. Even though the regulations still stay in the books, the law enforcement could alter.
Irrespective of one's stance on medicinal marijuana, advocates of the states' rights have to support the White House on this matter. It's not just about the states fighting over medical marijuana regulations with the federal government. There are other matters in the same entity, including but not limited to euthanasia, capital punishment, homosexual marriage. In all of these instances the federal government has been there to interpose with their legislations, which in a lot of cases displaces the laws of the USA. To all appearances the medical marijuana stance of White House can be a great victory of states' rights, but we'll only see it with the lapse of time. A lot of federal agencies will still be able to pursue federal regulations and prosecute people that use, grow, or sell marijuana. Currently, it is till up to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court supported the federal government in the Gonzales vs. Raich case, in 2005. It's not clear whether the current Supreme Court will judge in the same manner.
The sole true victory would be in case a law was enacted that would permit local and state governments to displace the federal laws on the issue of medical marijuana. This might open up an absolutely new set of regulations permitting the states to be completely amenable for enacting their personal constitutions, instead of the federal one. In case there are cities in America that don't use alcohol, then why isn't the law able to work in the other manner?
The federal government should continue working to locate an agreed basis where the rights of the states predominate without being unconversant with the casual needs of the USA considered altogether. Till laws are enacted conserving these rights, the DC class of rulers will be replacing the authority and power of the individual states where each and every marijuana clinic fights for its rights to cure people.